On Wed, 27 Jan 1999, Dave Drum wrote: > Whyizit everyone (almost) seems to think that sushi = raw fish??? > Sushi may have sashimi (which IS raw fish) as part of its makeup. But, > the facts are that there is more cooked seafood served in sushi than > raw seafood served in sushi. > > There, another stereotype destroyed. Another windmill tilted at > successfully. While there are many cooked sushi things (sushi is stuff on vinegared rice, btw), I think that the number of raw items exceeds the number of cooked ones. Sushi does not necessarily involve seaweed (nori) though most rolls use it (some don't). The cooked ones I can think of are octopus, squid, shrimp, egg (tomago), eel (unagi), crab, and spam. I'm not sure if monkfish liver is cooked. There are vegitarian forms of sushi too. These are not raw fish, but they are raw vegetables. It is interesting that there is very little use of chiles in the regular or normal types if sushi, but there is some chile paste used to make some spicy tuna, and to make some spicy mayo used in some rolls. I wonder, do we have any Chileheads living in Japan, or some Japanese Chileheads that might know if this is a cultural thing and if I'm correct? It is interesting in that Korean food has spicy forms, and Thai food is certainly spicy, but I've never thought of Japanese food as spicy. Comments??? Chuck Demas Needham, Mass. Eat Healthy | _ _ | Nothing would be done at all, Stay Fit | @ @ | If a man waited to do it so well, Die Anyway | v | That no one could find fault with it. demas@tiac.net | \___/ | http://www.tiac.net/users/demas