Re: [CH] OT New Yawk

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Sarah Banick: "[CH] re: Havana"
• Previous message: Graham: "[CH] County Agent"
• Maybe in reply to: byron bromley: "[CH] OT New Yawk"
• Next in thread: Jim Flanagan: "Re: [CH] OT New Yawk"

byron bromley wrote:
> 
> Folks  would like some .02's if I may.
> 
> I have been inivted to write in a garden section of the following.
> 
> http://www.im-ur.com
> 
> I am just a tad uncomfortable with it after I read their sample page.
> 
> What do you folks think.

Definitely not mainstream.... but, hey, anything goes. If you can live
with the freedom of speech and press taken toward their limits - go for
it. Maybe you'll get reprinted in the Enquirer or Globe or Weekly World
News.

Is there any compensation involved? If they are offereing valuata then
it's a no brainer. Cop the lolly and don't look back.  <GGG>
 
ENJOY!!!
--------
UNCLE DIRTY DAVE'S KITCHEN --
Home of Yaaaaa Hooooo Aaahhh!!! HOT SAUCE and Hardin Cider

• Next message: Sarah Banick: "[CH] re: Havana"
• Previous message: Graham: "[CH] County Agent"
• Maybe in reply to: byron bromley: "[CH] OT New Yawk"
• Next in thread: Jim Flanagan: "Re: [CH] OT New Yawk"