> > > I know a gal that sued a local "Applebee" rst. chain. >They offered > a > > salmon plate. There was no warning that this was >spicy hot. Placed > this gal in the hospital. > > She received a 5-digit out-of-court settlement.. > > I can understand that it may have been an unpleasant experience, but I'm > baffled by this. It's hard for me to to believe that food of any heat an > American chain restaurant would ever serve, even as its most challenging > item, could put even a complete non- > chilehead in the hospital. Doesn't it take a pretty extreme amount of > capsaicin to do actual physical damage as opposed to simply causing > discomfort? > > Of course, it's possible she was allergic--but then shouldn't she have > taken responsibility for asking about ingredients? > > Keep on rockin', I think the operant word is "settled". The restaurant couldn't afford the trial, which it may have won. Or may have been afraid of a "deep pockets" offense. You can sue anybody for anything. Unless it's an HMO in the US. Riley