At 08:42 AM 9/11/02, you wrote: >Felipe (Phil) DeGuzman writes: > > ... In the new Internet world we > > live in, warnings with mispellings generally mean that the content may be > > lesser than the warning implies. > >For the record, there were 4 warnings. The first one contained >no misspelling. > > > WARNING! Contains nudity! Knuckledraggers only. > ^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > >Besides, I've never heard that mispellings degrade warnings. That was indeed my take on it as well. The misspellings suggested to me that the warning was a joke. In any case, the "warning" was quite inadequate for me. It wasn't the lack of clothing that I found offensive.