Hey Felipe. I am glad to see you go. Now how about just going. So long. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Felipe (Phil) DeGuzman" <fdeguzma@cisco.com> To: "Dave Drum" <xrated@ameritech.net>; "Dickedy" <dickedy@hotmail.com>; <Chile-Heads@globalgarden.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 9:38 AM Subject: RE: [CH] The Many Uses of Hot Sauce - For Knuckledraggers Only > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Dave Drum [mailto:xrated@ameritech.net] > > Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 10:31 AM > > To: Felipe (Phil) DeGuzman; Dickedy; Chile-Heads@globalgarden.com > > Subject: RE: [CH] The Many Uses of Hot Sauce - For Knuckledraggers Only > > > > > > At 09:10 AM 9/11/2002 -0400, Felipe \(Phil\) DeGuzman wrote: > > >Thanks, Dickhead. Next time, if you want to send out porn, how about a > > >qualified warning. Using "catchy" spellings is not a good enough > > warning for > > > > Oddly enough there were three "qualified" warnings. NOTE: > > > > > > Do not click on the link if you find nekkid people offensive. > > > > Do not click on the link if you find nekkid people offensive. > > > > Do not click on the link if you find nekkid people offensive. > > > > What part of that didn't you understand??? > > Read the whole sentence, jerk. Catchy spellings like "nekkid" usually imples > that the content isn't truly pornographic. > > > >something that is this off-topic and vulgar. In the new Internet world we > > >live in, warnings with mispellings generally mean that the content may be > > >lesser than the warning implies. > > > > There you go making assumptions. Salaa _is_ on-topic. But, you > > are assuming > > (and we all know what "assume" does, huh?) that the whole world > > conforms to > > your extremely narrow view of it. No one pulled a gun on you and made you > > click on that link. > > > > Do you have a problem with reading comprehension. Multi-sentence paragraphs > difficult for you? > > > > >As of now, I am signing off this list. I use a company computer > > to check the > > >list, but with the level of stupidity of the poster of this pornshot, and > > >the general acceptance by the rest of you, I can't take the risk > > that this > > >has diminished to a forum for porn. > > > > A few questions before you go - > > > > A: Whatchoo doing reading personal e-mail at work? You wouldn't last long > > with my company if you did much of this. > > What are you doing reading email during business hours, jerk? You seem to > still be hanging in there reading presonal email at work. I guess my > employer appreciates the millions of dollars of value I add. Maybe you > should branch out. > > > > > B: Who are you to judge the rest of the list - most of whom have not > > weighed in on this deal. Did someone die and leave you in charge, or what? > > > > I never said I was in charge. I merely stated that if the most vocal members > of this list are accepting of this type of content, then this is a community > I do not wish to be part of. 24 hours later and clearly no one cares if > there are termites in the foundation of this group. I guess if Atlas > Shrugged you'd never know it. > > > C: How dare you presume to assume (there's that _word_ again) > > that we will > > miss you when you're gone? Didja ever stick your finger in a bucket of > > water and then pull it out? Look for the hole it leaves and try > > to see the > > hint it gives. > > Clever analogy, but poor execution on your part. I know this is definitely > not the forum for educated growers and enjoyers of hot peppers. > > > > > >Thanks to those who were helpful. > > > > What help? I don't recall _ever_ seeing a post from you and I've been a > > member of this list well over five years? Or, are you perchance referring > > to the few people who might think you are right or clever, if any? > > > I've posted many times. I guess it's hard for someone of your keen intellect > and hourly payscale to remember the more salient members of the community. > >