Re: [CH] Chile spam?
Scott Peterson (scottp4@mindspring.com)
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 08:12:19 -0800
At 08:47 AM 2/26/2003 +0000, you wrote:
>Doesn't the one to Pleiades Group just go back to Jim as domain holder? And
>the name Constant Contact doesn't indicate a strong anti-spam policy. I
>just always thought that sending the abuse notices back to the spammers just
>confirmed your address?
In this case, since the address had been harvested from an active mail list
I thought that 'validation' of the address was not such a big issue as it
is in other spam.
Sometimes, like this one, I will to see if they have a working abuse@
address. Spammers often don't and the message bounces. If it does bounce
I will submit it to an internet block list at www.rfc-ignorant that will
put them on a lot of serious block lists.
Scott Peterson
Two wrongs don't make a right,
but two Wrights made an airplane.