Re: [CH] Maybe an Imoderate Moderate?

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: tucker: "[CH] Oh yeah, Wal-Mart again..."
• Previous message: tucker: "Re: [CH] Snot neccesary"
• Maybe in reply to: Walter Spencer: "[CH] Maybe an Imoderate Moderate?"
• Next in thread: Gary Bellinger: "Re: [CH] Maybe an Imoderate Moderate?"

Steve M Duddy wrote:

> Okay so it seems we have a new chile cuisine classification! It fits
> perfectly if you ask me. Something moderates find toooo uncomfortable and
> that veteran chile-heads would scoff at... It's called (drum roll,
> please...)
>
> "S'not hot"

  Hey, I like that.  Maybe we'll see that on salsa labels soon.  Now would "S'not Hot" be a
hotter variety than "Hot" for grocery brands, or would it be a mild level for Dave's
Insanity products???

  Could really go either way...

--
Erich
C-H # 2099 & First Lieutenant of the Moderate Corps

• Next message: tucker: "[CH] Oh yeah, Wal-Mart again..."
• Previous message: tucker: "Re: [CH] Snot neccesary"
• Maybe in reply to: Walter Spencer: "[CH] Maybe an Imoderate Moderate?"
• Next in thread: Gary Bellinger: "Re: [CH] Maybe an Imoderate Moderate?"