Hi C-H's, Calvin wrote: >Without knowing >exactly how the study was performed and under what circumstances, it is >ABSOLUTELY IMPOSSIBLE to judge the reported results. Right on! Most of the papers published in the respected peer reviewed scientific press, for example "Nature", are simply hypotheses. A hypothesis is defined by Webster's dictionary as "a tentative assumption made in order to draw out and test its logical or empirical consequences." The popular press, and unfortunately a large number of medical practitioners, seem totally ignorant of this fact or choose to be ignorant. (Note that my comments refer to the most highly respected journals, not some un-reviewed guesswork in a quack "health" magazine.) >VIOLA!!!!! Eating chiles may cause cancer!!! Ah - it comes around again! Eating musical instruments can cause BRIAN damage!!! --- Regards, Cameron.