If you didn't delete the message as soon as you saw the subject, then you're probably not a chile bigot. But Chris M.'s musings about Covington made me wonder - is there anyone here who would stand to defend Skyline chili? For those who don't know about it, Skyline is a chili restaurant chain which I think originated with a lunch counter in Cincinnati. It's a very mild style of chili, with or without meat, and sometimes (always?) served over spaghetti. I've had it maybe twice in my 40 years, and I never really cared for it. It has its ardent fans, though, like White Castle hamburgers; there are stories of people going to great lengths to get some. The super-mild style of chili seems so contrary to the kind of thing we seem to prefer here. It doesn't even have a rich pepper flavor as if it had been made with a good amount of very mild chiles. When I have something like that, I wonder how much actual pepper powder there is in what I'm eating. There are all kinds of fillers and extenders, but how much chile is in the chili that's named for it? I do have to admit, though, that in the pre-chile-head days of my childhood ("BCH" or Before Chile Head) I loved a stovetop mix called Trail Boss Chili. I liked the wagon-wheel noodles (get it? trail, wagons, wheels?) but what I really loved was the strong taste of cumin in the seasoning mix. I still love that flavor to this day. Alex Silbajoris 72163.1353@compuserve.com packing for camping - full moon!