It has been very interesting to follow the mass of posts following my "flexible chili" question. Been reading them all with a constant smile on my face. Conclusion: Anything goes. So. I was brought up with Swedish style "Chili Con Carne". At that time I had no clue what the *words* meant. The Swedish version is minced beef, tomatoes, onion... and... y'all sitting down... Heinz Baked (white) Beans in Tomato Sauce. Usually spiced with nothing, ummm... salt, maybe some "chili powder" (mild mix of cumin, oregano, coriander... ), the more adventurous cooks would *walk by* the stove with a jar of cayenne powder, sometimes even with the lid off. Also, a must is ketchup, or (for the classy people) Heinz "Chili Sauce" (the Swedish bottle label even says it is essential for "chili con carne"). The ketchup's sweetness, together with the overall lack of acidity, makes for a truly bland "School Kitchen" taste. Indeed awful. It is usually served here with RICE. Well, I can understand the need for a cheap carbohydrate side... but... well, it does not go that well with that generous amount of beans. So, as I grew up, I learned that "chili con carne" means "peppers with meat". Simple. Great. And some "initiated" celebrity cook wrote somewhere that "The only thing that is NOT included in an 'Authentic Chili' is beans". Right. Thanks. Mexicans that don't have beans with every meal. Makes sense. Okay, got some ideas to implement. Get back to y'all later... Kristofer