On Sun, 17 Oct 1999, Richard Levy wrote: > Now, at this point in this kind of joke, it is possible to believe that the > second party KNEW it was a joke, predtended not to, and let the first party > look like an idiot trying to explain the joke. In real-time, if you act > credulous enough, you can make the first guy go nuts trying to explain "No, > it's a joke, see?" Well, I'm not wired that way, at least not on a mailing list where a lot of other people would be driven crazy too. I have played "Jimmy the Dunce" in RL when a good friend makes a really "clever" pun and wants that cleverness acknowledged; but what Doug did was essentially trying to play a practical joke on a whole mailing list, most of whom he doesn't know. Not the best way to make friends, and a waste of lots of people's time. FWIW, I agree with Gary's assessment of Doug. Chuck Demas Needham, Mass. > > >Doug Goldenberg" <dgoldenberg@sprintmail.com> > > > >That's the joke, silly. You say, seriously, "Hey, you know, gullible is > not > >in the dictionary." Their eyes widen with astonishment, as they say > >"Really?!!." Then they run over to the dictionary, and sure enough, > >gullible IS in the dictionary. At which point, they look at you puzzled, > >you smile smugly, and they hit you over the head with the dictionary. > Works > >every time. > >> > >> Now, I'm not the best speller, but I know how to use an online > dictionary, > >> and here's what I found from there: > >> | > >> | Main Entry: gull·ible > >> | : easily duped or cheated > >> > > > Eat Healthy | _ _ | Nothing would be done at all, Stay Fit | @ @ | If a man waited to do it so well, Die Anyway | v | That no one could find fault with it. demas@tiac.net | \___/ | http://www.tiac.net/users/demas