"BURTON NEIL ALEXANDER, ITID" <ATTBNA1@hq.psa.com.sg> wrote: > This makes it impossible to use in most asian dishes, as these require a > stickier rice that: > > A: can soak up plenty of gravy > B: can actually be eaten with chopsticks 1) In total, the residents of the Asian countries India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Thailand, Philippines, Indonesia, and Myanmar ("Burma") account for an awful lot of people, eating an awful lot of rice, and they don't use chopsticks (except for any Chinese residing therein). The (doubtfully, but possibly) slightly larger total numbers of Chinese and Japanese (and probably Koreans?) with their chopsticks may perhaps account for somewhat more "Asian dishes" being eaten with chopsticks than without, but it is certainly misleading to think that most asian dishes require "stickier rice". 2) In my observation, sticky rice soaks up considerably _less_ gravy than non-sticky rice, and this would seem to make sense. To retain the cohesiveness desired by chopstick users, sticky rice must determinedly adhere to itself here-and-there, and everywhere it does so adhere it necessarily excludes gravy from occupying the same place. On the contrary, separate grains of rice allow gravy to surround everywhere; a result too soupy for chopsticks is precisely because it contains so much gravy. peter gaffney <peter.g@telus.net> wrote: > <<...pre seasoned type, like jasmine or thai etc....>> > this is ( i believe ) a western european, or north american > preparation for rice. it's really like cooking pasta. 1) jasmine rice is not pre-seasoned, it is simply an especially fragrant, (naturally fragrant) type of rice; Basmati is the other pre-eminently famous type of fragrant rice. 2) This is not just a W.Europe/N.America method; plenty of traditional rice preparation recipes outside W.Europe/N.America involve boiling the rice then draining, e.g. India and Persia (Iran). --- Brent