penny x stamm <gardeners@globalgarden.com> wrote: > Catherine, our local Indian fancy restaurant serves the rice with > crumbled bacon on top. And most of the places serve Tandoori > chicken on a bed of fried mild onions. So I have combined the > effect.... Fried onions are a common side dish in India -- or at least fried shallots are common. As for bacon, your Indian restaurant might be fancy but it is anything but authentic. There are religious restrictions concerning the consumption of pork by a large percentage of the Indian population. The only authentic Indian dish that I know of that includes pork is Vendaloo, a dish developed in Goa by Portugese Christians. Both Julie Sahni and Madhur Jaffery in various cookbooks report that even among those Indians not bound to avoid pork due to religious restrictions rarely consume pork because it is considered a very poor meat, owing to the fact that a pig will eat anything. > Overall, I would never classify Indian cookery as vegetarian > in general. Indians do -- and not just Indian chefs or cookbook authors. This is a quote from _Recipes From India_ by the Indian Women Association of Pullman, WA. "Many delicious fish, poultry and meat dishes are eaten throughout India. These are what are often known in Western terms as "curries". However, about fifty percent of Indians even today are vegetarians for religious and economic reasons. Even those who classify themselves as non-vegetarians will base most of their meals on vegetarian cooking, deriving high quality protein from endless combinations of grains with a wide variety of beans and pulses (legumes). Due to this very reason, most of the recipes collected and presented in this book are vegetarian." Their huge menus are overwhelmingly varied > beef, lamb, chicken or shrimp/fish, with a minor number of > popular veggie dishes, very often spinach or eggplant Sorry, but this is dead wrong. There is an overwhelming number of vegetable dishes served in India. I've got more than 50 recipes just for cooking okra. In addition to numerous recipes for individual vegetables, there is an enormous variation in the types of vegetables grown and eaten in India. The only part of the US with a long tradition of that sort of variety in vegetable offerings is the southeast (and, in recent times, southern California), and even it falls short of matching Indian standards. > In a rooftop restaurant overlooking the airport at St.Louis is > a truly excellent Indian restaurant which serves a luncheon buffet. > So many of the dishes one might never order are there for the > sampling, and make converts of us! For some reason, Indian > food does not appear to suffer from sitting on a hot table, perhaps > because so many of their foods have prominent sauces. The > choices are predominantly meat dishes. Of course -- the customers are predominately American and it's likely they are ignorant Americans. Rarely do Indian restaurants offer authentic Indian cuisine. It is very, very difficult to persuade Indians in the restaurant business to offer authentic dishes, even by special request. They fear the reputation they will get -- too hot, weird foods, strange tastes, "it isn't anything like the food at the Tandoori King and we really like it", etc. It means they will go out of business. In much the same way, authentic Chinese, Thai and Korean foods are rarely found in American restaurants unless those restaurants are located in areas that are predominately Chinese, Thai or Korean. Sea cucumber is not frequently listed on American menus. BTW, Catharine's name is spelled with 2 A's in it. Liz