Whenever anyone speaks of "authentic" this or that, I am reminded that none of us is an expert in all things. One may know how to protect a rose from the snows of winter while another is an expert in keeping sun scald from late tomatoes. The recent discussions about East Indian (as opposed to Red Indian) food are a case in point. Those whose experience has been limited to US restaurant fare may find a "curry" or a Samosa totally delicious while a more traveled or experienced diner would find the same fare unacceptable in the extreme. For example: as a Texan, I take the making, serving and eating of chili as an art form. Once, for my sins, I was sentenced to a bowl of Cincinnati chili -- I'm certain the Ohioans found it delectable; I found it garbage in its purest form, but it would have been discourteous of me to fault them for their provinciality. While living in England, my good neighbor found my tea undrinkable while I found his coffee dispicable. Instead of re-starting the War of Independence we met under a white flag; he taught me to make tea, I taught him to make coffee. A better solution, don't you agree? If it is difficult to agree on something as simple as dissolving one substance in hot water -- consider the difficulties of agreeing on East Indian food. Of course it is true that Muslims (83% of the population) are forbidden pork as are almost all high-caste Indians, but I am sure there are those (usually the untouchables, I am told) who would eat bacon if sufficiently hungry (just as our local deer will even eat gray plants when there is little else to eat).. At base, we must all keep open minds, be agreeable, and permit others their culinary peculiarities; after all, they are usually based on inexperience and that is to be pitied, not censured. On the other hand, no one who IS inexperienced should claim expertise nor attempt to instruct others in their own ignorance. To do so would not be in keeping with the courtesy always shown by the members of GlobalGarden. Pat