Re: [gardeners] Definately one word. ;-)

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: George Shirley: "Re: [gardeners] Re:Scalleywags? Definately one word. ;-)"
• Previous message: Margaret Lauterbach: "Re: [gardeners] Definately one word. ;-)"

At 06:28 AM 10/13/98 -0600, you wrote:
>>
>>You know, Idaho might not have too many problems with Californians.  
>>Might be enough loons here to protect the state.  Might even come out 
>>better if the Californians do move in.
>>
>>Liz
>>
>It might be enlightening to you to take a look at the state budget and see
>how much is being set aside for prisons. They're taking the money out of
>what is left for higher education budgets after the public schools have
>their way with it, and giving it to prisons.  
>
>It does rile me to hear the immigrants say "Whew!  Now shut the door to
>immigration" once they get here, then later they start making fun of the
>natives.  It wasn't the Idahoans who had to move to find a tolerable
>lifestyle, it was those making fun of them.  Margaret
>
Gee, here I thought all the Californians were coming to Arizona :-))

Pat in Phoenix
>
Pat Kolb
Contributing Editor, Suite 101
Low Desert Gardening
 http://www.suite101.com/topics/page.cfm/357

• Next message: George Shirley: "Re: [gardeners] Re:Scalleywags? Definately one word. ;-)"
• Previous message: Margaret Lauterbach: "Re: [gardeners] Definately one word. ;-)"