At 09:36 PM 3/30/99 -0500, you wrote: >I was tongue in cheek about the fireflies, but wasn't there a big uproar >over scientists successfully gene spliced a gene from a fish, like salmon, >with a tomato? Consumer groups were upset because people who were allergic >to one kind of food, might not know that they may have an allergic reaction >because of mixed species? They either wanted this practice to stop, or >better labeling in markets to warn consumers. Did this tomato ever come to >market? Come on, somebody tell me they've heard of this before..... > >Pete, Zone 10, South Florida Pete, I think they spliced that salmon gene into the tomato to get the tomato to return to its roots...er, redds, where it was spawned. Americans don't know what kind of Frankenstein foods they're eating because the FDA is taking a few years off. Europeans aren't eating those foods because they know what foods are from genetically unnatural sources and are rejecting them. If the report is correct, that 100% of the soybean crop in America will be genetically manipulated this year, pray for the babies that have to drink soymilk. ("Look like soybeans to me," Able Slush of the FDA commented, hitching his overalls and sending a quid of brown juice into the dust.) Margaret L