RE: [tomato] Pete's tomato problem

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Pete: "[tomato] More virus opinions"
• Previous message: Catharine Vinson: "RE: [tomato] Pete's tomato problem"
• In reply to: Catharine Vinson: "RE: [tomato] Pete's tomato problem"

At 12:58 PM 12/15/1999 -0500, you wrote:
>Margaret wrote:
> I still would like some documentation for
>the comment that indeterminate tomato plants are more prone to
>nutritional
>stress, alleged by Ken Pernezney.
>
>Me, too. The only thing I can think that he may mean is that because
>indeterminates grow and produce over a longer period of time that their
>nutritional needs are greater overall and over a longer span of time.
>I'm stumped if that's not what he's getting at.
>
>Catharine/Atlanta, zone 7b
>
Pete sent me his email address, so I just asked him privately if he has
documentation. If he does, I'll let you know.  Margaret
>

• Next message: Pete: "[tomato] More virus opinions"
• Previous message: Catharine Vinson: "RE: [tomato] Pete's tomato problem"
• In reply to: Catharine Vinson: "RE: [tomato] Pete's tomato problem"