At 10:28 AM 9/11/2002 -0700, kd wrote: >At 08:42 AM 9/11/02, you wrote: > >>Felipe (Phil) DeGuzman writes: >> > ... In the new Internet world we >> > live in, warnings with mispellings generally mean that the content may be >> > lesser than the warning implies. >> >>For the record, there were 4 warnings. The first one contained >>no misspelling. >> >> > WARNING! Contains nudity! Knuckledraggers only. >> ^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> >>Besides, I've never heard that mispellings degrade warnings. > >That was indeed my take on it as well. The misspellings suggested to me >that the warning was a joke. >In any case, the "warning" was quite inadequate for me. It wasn't the >lack of clothing that I found offensive. Was it the waste of salsa when ketchup would have served as well??? ENJOY!!! Uncle Dirty Dave's Kitchen Home of Hardin Cider & Yaaaaa Hoooo Ahhhhh Hot Sauce!!!