Re: [CH] Debate at Our House
Dan Gillis (DanGillis@earthlink.net)
Fri, 14 Feb 2003 22:11:03 -0500
I happen to think that Tabasco is much hotter than Franks. I'm a hab eater
at heart, and contrary to the many anti-tabascites out there, I think
Tabasco is a great everyday/everywhere sauce. I'd ask for it over Franks at
any restaurant when you can't get anything else or when my stash of habanero
powder is empty... and for that matter I ask for it when there ARE other
things available.
I also agree that the aging process is the key with Tabasco. We have a
bottle at the house that we treat like sourdough.. that is, we always save
some to put into the next batch. I don't want to tell you how long we've
been doing this, because...well..it may just be too gross.
Anyway.. my vote is for Tabasco being hotter.
Dan
----- Original Message -----
From: "RisaG" <radiorlg@yahoo.com>
To: <chile-heads@globalgarden.com>
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 6:45 PM
Subject: [CH] Debate at Our House
> Steve & I have been having this debate for years and
> it is getting on my nerves. So, I thought I would post
> it here and see what other chile-heads think.
>
> The debate is...
>
> Is Tabasco hotter than Frank's Red Hot?
>
> I find both of them have no heat really but he seems
> to feel that Tabasco is very hot and Frank's just has
> wonderful taste and very little heat. What do you
> think?
>
> I can't be judgemental anymore as my tongue no longer
> feels any heat from the Tabasco bottle. years ago it
> did but I still felt it had no real discernable heat
> then either.
>
> What do you think?
>
>
>
> =====
> RisaG
>
> Risa's Food Service
> http://www.geocities.com/radiorlg
> Updated 2/07/03
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Shopping - Send Flowers for Valentine's Day
> http://shopping.yahoo.com
>