At 08:52 AM 1/9/98 +0000, you wrote: >Tom Clothier <gardeners@globalgarden.com> wrote: > >> >> From: Pat Vinson <asidv@ktc.com> >> >> >Best name I've heard for Mr. Gate's mania. Thanks, I'll quote you. Also >> >thanks for the excellent review of IE 4.0. >> >> One of the problems with media discussions of home computing is >> that they tend to talk only about the hardware and software under >> development. By the time you get around to replacing your antiquated >> system, they are no longer discussing the products that you find >> in the store. The result is that unless you go out and purchase every >> new o/s, web browser, high power chip, etc. right away, you find >> yourself hopelessly out of date in every discussion. > >I solved that problem a couple of years ago. I went out with an >ill-gotten inheritance and blew about $4000 on state of the art >equipment. Yes, sad as it sounds to those of you who are more modern >than I, my big bucks bought a P166, a 19"monitor, a set of big altec >lansing speakers with a sub-woofer, an HP 5p printer (I'll never buy >an HP again but that's another story), a 6x CD-ROM and a blazingly >fast graphics card with 4 Megs of memory, a 2 gig hard drive and 32 >Meg of ram. > >The point? I haven't looked at a computer magazine since I bought my >machine. I know that I'm getting out of date because I bought a game >that came out in July and the minimum requirements included a P100. >But the truth is that my machine is still blazingly fast, the >graphics are glorious and the sound is awesome because I no one has >told me how slow and plain my system is. I refuse to let my sis tell >me about mmx and won't talk to my brother in law about the new stuff >he's buying. > >My head is stuck firmly in the sand and I'm satisfied. Now if I >could just muster up the courage to not look at seed catalogues. > >Liz > You always were just a little bit fast Liz. ;-)) George, who's sorta slow most days