At 03:27 PM 1/17/98 -0600, you wrote: > >From: jaime <jknoble@warwick.net> > > >>George? What in the heck was that? Do you have any idea? I >>mean I realize it bounced ... there was an error .... how did >>you get it then? Color me confused. > >As lillian explained it to me, there is a glitch which she is trying >to correct. Apparently the computer processing mail to this >maillist looks for words that it understands, like *s*u*b*s*c*r*i*b*e* >and if it finds that word, it assumes that the mail was intended >for it (the computer), and since your note responding to >Margaret's post was full of other words that it did not >understand, was obliged to bounce the mail to the listowner. > >There may be one or two other words that fall into this category >as well. It remains to be seen. In the meanwhile, I think it >may be useful to refrain from using that word (command) in >any context unless you encrypt it as I have done above. > >tom > Tom's right, it also looks for "u*n*s*u*b*c*r*i*b*e". Lillian asked for those two words to be removed from the filter list and I think they have been. George