At 07:18 PM 4/20/98 -0500, you wrote: > >From: asidv@fbg.net <asidv@fbg.net> > >>Standing Cypress: gilia rubra, a biennial or perennial that >>will grow from seed and sometimes even bloom the first year. It is >>3 to 5 feet high, with feathery, threadlike leaves. The flowers are >>scarlet, in a plume, and open from bottom to top. > >I know this as Ipomopsis rubra. The USDA plant database lists >both, and indicates they are synonymous. Does anyone know >which is more botanically correct? > >They show gilia as the common name for some ipomopsis sp. >They show ipomopsis as the common name for some gilia sp. >What the hell is more tiresome than taxonomy. > >manytimes, >tom >zone 5a, NE Illinois, -21ºF Min >http://www.anet-chi.com/~manytimes > > It's those blasted botanists, they're trying to confuse the issue so they can keep working. Once you're thoroughly confused then they decide to rename a whole bunch of plants to confuse you further. Down with taxonomy, down with botanists, gardeners of the world arise! George, who stays confused anyway