Liz wrote: > I think that over the next 20 - 40 years there is going to be a > backlash against tasteless veggies. Producing food that can > withstand the stress of shipping, machine picking, storing and > processing has been a priority for good reason. We now have many > varieties with excellent productivity that meet those needs. The > next step will be to put flavor back into the equation. Flavor is > going to one day be the edge in what sells and what doesn't. Ok, let's look at retail merchandising: malls, department stores, etc. In the past 30 years there has been a tremendous explosion in the sheer variety of stuff manufactured and merchandised. I'm not sure whether the consumer demanded the mind-boggling variety of choices of bicycle pants, to use a wacko example, or if the consumer has been manipulated into believing that it is inherently a) better b) his right c) inevitable that he be faced with 50 choices at a glance. We have come an awfully long way from "any color you like, as long as it's black" in cars, clothes, refrigerators.....the *bric-a-brac* of late-20th century living in North America and Western Europe, in particular. How odd that the reverse seems to be true in the case of *food.* Since the turn of the century, our choices in terms of varieties of fruits, grains, vegetables, etc. has shrunk alarmingly. Less than 5% of the kinds of beans that were available 80 years ago are now offered...somthing like that. Enter the Age of Merchandising of Diversity in Foodstuffs? Are we going to see 30 years of heirloom and "new hybrid" proliferation akin to the industrial "model of the year" of industrial output (and software, and etc.)? Will what worked for deodorant and toothpaste and tennis shows work for 'taters and 'maters? Should it? Catharine