Re: [gardeners] 1980

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Ron Hay: "Re: [gardeners] Bastrop Gardening and OT stuff"
• Previous message: Martha Brown: "Re: [gardeners] Bastrop Gardening and OT stuff"
• Maybe in reply to: Craig Watts: "[gardeners] 1980"

Hi, George,

Yes, time should be unimportant to gardeners; but I rarely look at the very top
of the old mail in my inbox for recent posts, which may be of relevance. Not a
complaint, just an observation.

Ron

George Shirley wrote:

> Craig Watts wrote:
> >
> > I was prepared for Y1k, never got the Y2k memo. It contained the info on
> > the baggy jeans the kids are wearing these days.
> >
> > (george is perfectly correct. My home computer is a 75 mhz OLD pentium.)
> >
> > At work, I've got all the fire power in the world, but enjoy "life" here on
> > my home computer.
> >
> > I did all the updates at work and dodged all the Y2k stuff with an out of
> > pocket of zero.
> >
> > "Just make it work."
> >
> > Craig Watts
> > kingdomm@worldnet.att.net
>
> Time should be totally unimportant to gardeners. That's one of the
> things I enjoy about aging - "What day of the month is it?" Or
> occasionally, "What month is it?" The best thing about aging is you get
> to be eccentric and it doesn't annoy people. They just say "He's an
> eccentric old F***, isn't he?"
>
> George

• Next message: Ron Hay: "Re: [gardeners] Bastrop Gardening and OT stuff"
• Previous message: Martha Brown: "Re: [gardeners] Bastrop Gardening and OT stuff"
• Maybe in reply to: Craig Watts: "[gardeners] 1980"