I'd say so. I have a holly tree and a holly-leaved laurel, both around 15 ft. (that's a wild guess, they may be taller). The house was built in 1952, and the original landscaping has sort of out-grown the (tiny) yard since then. In addition to the hollies, we found two orange trees (and 2 large stumps left in the lawn), a Magnolia grandifolia, a Carolina cherry laurel, a Pittosporum tobira (now a tree), several shiny xylosmas (also trees), and a Nandina domestica forest. Nice plants, but they would look a lot better in a larger yard. Sherryl, not very good at thinning, either Northern Calif., zone 9b (HOT) At 10:59 PM 06/10/2000 -0700, Carol wrote: >Hi Folks, >I have a slightly odd question for you.. is it possible to have a 40' >high holly tree in Southern California? The garden sites I checked talk >about it as a southeastern tree, but say nothing about it as a >southwestern tree. > <snip>