At 10:23 AM 7/1/99 -0500, you wrote: >Daryl, > >I will not disagree with you on it being illegal to use diesel fuel as a stand >alone herbicide. I will admit that I can't quote the law on it and I have made >some enquiries about it and should know something before long. You have tweeked >my interest on this issue and will pursue it until I have some answers and if >I'm wrong, I'll let ya know. ;-) > >However, I do know that it's perfectly legal to use diesel as a surfactant >and/or emulsifier here in Texas. These are common practices here for brush >control and insect control (mesquitos and flies). I've used diesel, in the >manner I described previously, most of my life. I'm not saying that this is >justification, but when used in a common sense attitude, as with all chemicals, >it is very affective. And as I've stated before, you have tweeked my interest >and I'm interested in knowing exactly what the law says because I don't believe >it is completely illegal to use diesel and am interested in knowing where they >draw the line for private use and property rights. > >I do agree that diesel can be "incredibly" toxic when not used properly. The >laws that were developed were probably more aligned with stopping folks like the >Railroads and highway departments from washing their right of ways with diesel. >But, too much of anything can be incredibly toxic. And I believe that in the >case of my own folks, I'd rather see diesel in their hands than to think of the >damage they could do with something such as Roundup or gasoline. I have spent >several years doing PST (petroleum storage tank) work and know that gasoline is >several times worse than diesel when it comes to the environment. > >Unfortunately, I wasn't consulted before the application event with Roundup or >I'd've recomended something other than Roundup, such as Brush B Gone, or would >have at least advised waiting until this winter to start acting against the >stuff with mechanical removal then treatment. I try to stear away from chemical >treatments if mechanical treatment can be accomplished. > >Thanks > >Paul Reynolds >Environmental Agronomist >Austin Texas > I was nailed by the Idaho state dept. of ag for "recommending use of a pesticide contrary to label directions" for recommending corn gluten meal for a pre-emerge. CGM is not labeled as a pesticide, but I didn't want the legal expenses. That may be a law in your area too. If you're richer than I, challenge it. Margaret L