David A. Verbil wrote: > I seem to be missing something here - if dry lentils are 3.4 calories > a gram, 100 grams cooked would not be 340 calories, as quite a > bit of the weight would be water ... > DAVe > > > >- -> also didn't understand why he said lentils were fattening. > > >Me either, but maybe he'll explain? > > > > > > So go look it up! Dry lentils are about 3.4 calories per gram, so if you > > have 100 grams of the things (about the least you could get away with as > > the basis for a meal), you're already up for 350 calories! Heh heh heh... at this point, it all gets too confusing for my lentil-sized brain. I do know that they taste good, they're a great source of lots of swell vitamins, minerals and fibre. But JB, buddy, if you don't want to eat them, that is absolutely your right. I defend it, as I defend my own to never eat bell peppers. (Anyone else here a hardcore CH but can't stand plain green and red peppers? Why do you suppose we're like that?)