RE: [CH] Foliar feeding

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Douglas Irvine: "Re: [CH] That chile thing has run its course"
• Previous message: Alex Silbajoris: "[CH] That chile thing has run its course"
• In reply to: Byron Bromley: "[CH] Foliar feeding"
• Next in thread: Byron Bromley: "Re: [CH] Foliar feeding"

Byron,

> But there is also not enough phosphorous or potassium in fish emulsion for
> good stem and stalk growth,   Manure or compost tea will give you
> more than
> fish and still be OG. IMHO the best that there is for fertilizer, NPK
> numbers low enough to prevent excess nitrogen problems, won't burn plants,

OG--OrGanic?  And you're saying manure and compost tea are the best?  Better
than mine tailings?

>
> Pricing is also awsome,  Debra and Scott are working on that.
>

If so, I don't get the pricing part???

> 1 aged methane's opinion
> Byron
>

I read, I believe in the Merck Manual (the physician's diagnostic manual,
not the chemical dictionary) that flatulence, at least that caused by
[chili, to stay OT] beans, is more hydrogen than methane.  The author seemed
to have a rather irreverent view of the subject, though.

An aspiring H2 generator.

Riley

• Next message: Douglas Irvine: "Re: [CH] That chile thing has run its course"
• Previous message: Alex Silbajoris: "[CH] That chile thing has run its course"
• In reply to: Byron Bromley: "[CH] Foliar feeding"
• Next in thread: Byron Bromley: "Re: [CH] Foliar feeding"