margaret lauterbach wrote: > > At 08:48 PM 9/19/99 -0700, you wrote: > >that's just one aspect, Linda, in addition the terminator seeds can render > >other healthy crops sterile, and it's a very very sobering and alarming > >issue. It's my belief that the terminator seed technology is a concerted > >effort by agri-dizziness to do away with the small farmer and control our > >food supply. There's nothing I've seen to counteract that suspicion, > >unfortunately. The other alarming aspect is our USDA, FDA, and EPA has not > >required companies to label produce, goods or seeds that have been > >genetically engineered so epidemeological studies, or tracking vectors of > >disease which may be induced by such tinkering won't be possible. It's > >disgusting. > > > >Grow organic, trade seeds, go natural! Trading seeds is especially critical. > > > Worse yet, the USDA funded and is a co-patentee of the terminator > technology. With friends like our government, who needs enemies? People > call asking for political donations get my message: All political parties > can take a flying leap. A plague on all their houses. They're doing nothing > FOR us, they're too busy doing stuff TO us. Margaret L Uhh, folks, don't want to point any fingers but the terminator seed talk is degenerating into a political discussion contrary to our charter. Let's move on to another subject, maybe how to garden in a flood for the folks in the Carolinas and points further east. ;-) George Shirley listowner and guard dog