I had preconceived ideas (wrong ones) about what SF was, and hadn't read any until y'all had the discussion about it, I think on the other gardens list. I just borrow from the library and found that I really enjoy Card's writings - always thought provoking, tho sometimes disturbing. I'll probably run out of his books this winter and be asking for more recommendations. Barb in Idaho At 05:44 PM 6/19/02 -0500, you wrote: >Yeah, most of what Card has written. Speculative fiction is about right but mostly it's called >alternate history writing. Lots of good stuff out there if you look for it. We have a Book Warehouse >nearby and I hate to go in there as they have a very large science fiction and fantasy section. >Costs me 50 or 60 bucks when I do go, mostly because Miz Anne is with me and we end up buying some >art books too. > >George > >barbb@velocitus.net wrote: >> >> Anyone read Pastwatch by Orson Scott Card? Basically he says history >> doesn't matter because it can all be changed. Course he does write >> speculative fiction. The book starts out sometime way in the future and >> ends up changing the outcome of Columbus' voyage. >> >> Barb in Idaho >> >> At 03:47 PM 6/19/02 -0400, you wrote: >> >Shucks Margaret, why don't you just speak up there? <VBG> You and I >> >are old enough to remember the NEBC (No Europeans Before Columbus) >> >group of historians, archaeologists, anthropologists too. Now it is >> >accepted theory that yes, Virginia, there were Europeans in the New >> >World before Chris Columbus, >> > >> >In Canada, George:Newfoundland, a place today known as L'Anse aux >> >Meadows. NW tip of Newf. A 9th century Viking settlement was found, >> >complete with runes, which dated the place to Eric the red or was it lief >> >erikson or are these the same guys??? oh, I should go check but too lazy >> >right this minute. The exciting thing is the refs in the runes tie into >> some of >> >the norse sagas which we all thought were bs when we read them in school. >> > None of this was discovered before the 80s, which puts an awful lot of >> us in >> >the no Europeans before Columbus camp. >> > >> > also Asians and possibly Africans. >> >Australian Aborigines, I would doubt that myself. Pacific Islanders, >> >no doubt at all. >> > >> >I though Pacific Islanders were related to the Abos...where is Evil John >> these >> >days? He should know, and even if he doesn't I'm sure he would venture an >> >opinion:)). >> > >> >Lucinda >> > >> >George >> > >> >Margaret Lauterbach wrote: >> >> >> >> I've been thinking of you, Lucinda. Is school out yet? We >> >> recently watched a program on a digital Discovery channel about >> >> early population of parts of Brazil and the southern tip (name >> >> escapes me at the moment). French archaeologists were claiming that >> >> descendants of Australian aborigines settled Brazil 12 to 15,000 >> >> years ago IIRC (anyway, it was earlier than the usual 11,000 years >> >> that I've read), having crossed the Pacific Ocean then,not being >> >> content to be on solid ground, hiked across the northern tip of >> >> South America to settle in the Amazon basin. Then they migrated >> >> southward, serving as the Tierra del Fuegan "Indians." I sat there, >> >> turned to Chuck and said "this is bullshit. I'm changing channels." >> >> Are these French archaeologists (female) as whacko as I think, or is >> >> it me? Margaret L >> >> >> >> >What old roses do you have George? >> >> > >> >> >Lucinda >> > >> > > >