-----Original Message----- From: Margaret Lauterbach <mlaute@micron.net> To: tomato@GlobalGarden.com <tomato@GlobalGarden.com> Date: Saturday, October 17, 1998 11:53 AM Subject: [tomato] It's your turn >Chuck, Catharine and I have explained why we prefer open pollinated >tomatoes to hybrids. I think the fellow who accused us of ulterior motives >ought to explain why he was defending hybridization. Margaret Margaret, I do not feel I am defending hybrids...but rather the freedom to discuss merits without feeling a need to defend myself. Last year I saw discussion being squelched and you three ending up 'talking' to each other as if the rest of us on the Listserv didn't exist. There was very little participation after that. There are so many variables in gardening (and tomatoes fit here too) that reducing them to open pollinated (and heirlooms) and hybrids seems to me to be oversimplifcation. My feelings about hybridization include the notion that the goals selected do not need to be cannonballs, tastless, and designed only for shipping. You could hybridize for any qualities within the realm of 'tomatoes'. Recombining traits and increasing vigor is wide open for the garden/hybridizer. Chuck talked some about stabilizing a strain...which is an interesting plan for those of us that have the space and desire. I'd like to know more about this. I am not interested, however, in finding out how I am being duped by big business or some other nebulous force when I don't mind spending a few bucks for the convience of buying seeds or plants. Sincerely Louis Mensing Eugene, OR