>Who knows.... maybe I'll even like tomatoes after I use VAM fungi on >different species and start getting some that are really tasty. <grin> >Most tomatoes I've grown in the past have been yucky tasting to me... so as >I get into growing classier tomatoes with VAM, I am expecting to have >results that will taste much better than the non-VAM treated plants I've >been growing in the past. > >Best Regards, > >Thomas Giannou >Spokane, Washington Thomas, it's very clever of you to sneak in your sales pitch for VAM by saying "tomatoes I've grown in the past have been yucky tasting to me, then have a post in which you praise the flavor of tomatoes. Here's an example: when my brother who basically dislikes even eating tomato's, samples some of my cherry tomato's and eats a warm ripe beef steak tomato from the garden with a little salt and pepper on it says, "This tastes a heck of a lot better than what I usually experience.... I could really get used to eating tomato's if they tasted like these!" Then, I am thinking... it's not just my opinion that those are really good tasting..." But it really confuses the issue, IMO. I fail to understand just how the addition of VAM results in less grass production also. I'm getting a whiff of "you have to buy it every year for maximum effectiveness." But from what I've read in AHS and other garden magazines, mycorrhizae are naturally occurring, and if you have an established tomato patch, the mycorrhizae are there. I have grown tomatoes in the same patch for all but one of the past 30 years, so if mycorrhizae supporting tomates could be there, they are. The one concession I'm making is that we're not tilling that patch this year. We'll just do the Ruth Stout thing and save our backs. I can see how tilling could damage fragile and invisible (!) mycorrhizae. So we're selecting natural over man-made stuff, and frankly, I'm weary of hearing about the stuff. Margaret L