=Mark wrote: <snip> > I was not singling out your proposition, just bundling all the suggestions > from various folks over the last couple days and projecting a direction in > which the momentum seemed to be moving. OK. I misunderstood. A number of people have suggested various items that could be placed at such a site. If aggregated, this would be a large site and significant work. This I expected, as I solicited comment (which I have retained). My suggestion is to start "lean" and then consider expanding the scope - perhaps to a full website. By "lean" I mean perhaps about 160 items. E.g. split over two groups (FAQ & Info), with 8 topics per group. > A reconstructed website might not be such a bad idea, the list survived > it's first 5 or 6 years with one. Concur > There would have to be a fair division of work, the FAQ > could be just an initial portion of the site. Concur > Of course a comment by List Guy Mike B. may help clarify what would be appropriate. Absolutely Regards, Andy