"world's most horrendously ugly" is not exactly high praise! Maybe we ought to rethink this choice. David At 12:06 PM 1/30/99 -0400, you wrote: >> Speaking of tree suggestions, we're thinking about an atlas >> cedar for our front yard -- specifically, a weeping blue atlas >> cedar. Anybody know anything about them? >> >> David > >David, > >I have a 15 - 20 year old one that I inherited with the house. >Aside from the fact that someone chopped off one of the main >(lateral) branches (the tree can be turned so that it can't be >seen), it's a large and much-admired specimen by those in the >know (several arborists & landscape designers). Except IMO it >is one of the world's most horrendously ugly trees. If you >would care to make me an offer, you are more than welcome to >come on up, help me remove it from the tie raised bed it is in, >ball it up ... it's yours. I'll even make lunch and most likely >throw in a trunkful of perennial divisions (ask 'em what's been >here about how that works :). Since it is in way less than >perfect condition, it'll be cheap for the price. ;^) There >were several Ratchet uses that did the poor tree no favors but >seems to have done it no great harm, either. > >Should you be interested, I'll put a photo of it up on the web. > >The only way I've been able to figure out how to use this thing >design-wise and not get ill everytime I look at it is to put it >raised & next to a waterfall. > >What would you like to know about it? It's growing in >part-shade, sandy, rather poor soil. It's competing with a >carpet of 15 y.o. blue rug juniper for what little nutrition >there is ~ under a covering of landscape fabric and large red >"decorative" rock. I've never fed the thing & it still grows >about a foot a year. My sense is that one is hard-pressed to >kill the thing. > >Save me from further attempts at tree murder, please. :) > >Jaime >jknoble@warwick.net >USDA Zone 6/5 ==> NW NJ >Friends help you move. Real friends help you move bodies. > >