Get thee to a Public Library and find Consumer Reports. They'll have reviewed TVs in the recent past. ----- Original Message ----- From: "David G. Smith" <dgsmith@delanet.com> To: <gardeners@globalgarden.com> Sent: Friday, July 14, 2000 8:19 AM Subject: Re: [gardeners] OT clueless newbie buying high-end TV > I can't answer your question but I'll tell you what my father-in-law (TV > repairman) told us when we were looking: buy the cheapest one that has a > picture you like. > > David > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Bob Kirk <reikirk@ksu.edu> > To: gardeners <gardeners@globalgarden.com>; gardeners > <gardeners@globalgarden.com> > Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2000 7:11 PM > Subject: [gardeners] OT clueless newbie buying high-end TV > > > > Because these are the largest groups I have access to that will tolerate > > stuff like this. Back-channel replies welcome - what I'd most like to find > > is a mailing list or newsgroup where these questions are on topic, but > > reference, deja, news.groups etc. aren't proving much help. > > > > For my mom, who really >needs< a new TV but isn't ever going to see any > > benefit from a fully "digital-ready" set. Based on hours of looking and > > websurfing, what model isn't in question - Sony Wega 24" or 27" (say Vega: > > spelled otherwise for at least partly obvious reasons, but why didn't they > > just call it Arcturus or something?). > > Anyway: is a second RF input worth paying $100 for a set with 2-tuner > PIP > > that will never be used? What criteria dictate that component-video inputs > > (in addition to S-video) are worth paying the $150 or so difference for a > > 27" vs 24" set? Near as I can determine these are probably the ultimate > > expression of analog TV, but is there anything else in the pipeline > between > > these and digital that I might want to know about? > > > > bk--- > > > > vaguely thinking he might be willing to bid the right set in at auction > > so my sister gets her share of the estate (but hopefully by then it will > > obviously not be worth doing). > > > > > > >